Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2022-12-15 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G53's overall score of 72. Despite of the fact that the LG Velvet is a lot older than the Motorola Moto G53, it's design is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner. The LG Velvet counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Moto G53, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG Velvet features a bit better looking screen than Moto G53, because it has a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen, a little bit bigger display and a much better 1080 x 2460 resolution. The LG Velvet has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G53, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto G53 features improved battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery size. The LG Velvet features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G53, although it has a back-facing camera with less MP, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.