Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-12-15 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G53's 72 global score. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Motorola Moto G53 has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy A50s construction is a little thinner and a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G53, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
Galaxy A50s has a much greater processing power than Moto G53, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G53, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Galaxy A50s takes a lot better pictures and videos than Moto G53, although it has a back camera with a worse resolution and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and video. Motorola Moto G53 features a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G53 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G53 counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.