Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-12-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Moto G53's score of 72. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while Moto G53 has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an extremely older and much heavier phone than the Moto G53, but Samsung was able to build it thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much more powerful CPU than Moto G53, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more vivid display than Moto G53, because it has a greater pixels density, a bigger display and a much better resolution of 1768 x 2208.
The Motorola Moto G53 features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G53 features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better camera than Moto G53, although it has a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.