Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Metal | Polycarbonate |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S4 has an overall score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G5S Plus's 74.8 overall score. Galaxy S4's design is way lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, although it was released 4 years before. Moto G5S Plus counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more processing cores and more RAM.
Galaxy S4 counts with a much better looking display than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, the Galaxy S4 also counts with a just a little higher pixel quantity in each inch of display. Motorola Moto G5S Plus features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
The Motorola Moto G5S Plus features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S4, and although they both have a camera with a 13 megapixels resolution, the Motorola Moto G5S Plus also has a way higher (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture. Moto G5S Plus counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S4, because it has a 15 percent larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S4 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.