Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G7's 75.2 general score. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is newer and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G7's, but it's also just a little thicker.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Moto G7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G7, and although they both have a same size screen, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a little bit better pixels density and a little higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
The Moto G7 features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with improved battery performance than Motorola Moto G7, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better camera than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos, better 60 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a better resolution.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G7. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto G7, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.