Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G7's 75.2 score. Even when LG V35 ThinQ and Motorola Moto G7 were released with only a few months difference, LG V35 ThinQ is just a little lighter and a little thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than Moto G7, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Moto G7, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ takes slightly better videos and photos than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture and a much better 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back. LG V35 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery performance than Moto G7, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G7, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.