Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G73 5G, with a 91.8 score against 73.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto G73 5G has Android 13. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Moto G73 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better display than Motorola Moto G73 5G, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a quite bigger screen. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a better camera than Moto G73 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much more megapixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G73 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G73 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.