Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than Moto G8 Power Lite, having a global score of 83.7 against 74.3. These phones include Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie. The LG V50 ThinQ is an older cellphone than Moto G8 Power Lite, but LG managed to make it a little lighter and a bit thinner anyway.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ captures better photographs and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and a much higher (4K) video quality. LG V50 ThinQ has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.