Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than Moto G8, with a score of 91.1 against 74.4. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version and Moto G8 has Android 10, counting with a lot of extra features and performance optimizations. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is newer and just a little thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Moto G8.
Galaxy A52s has a sharper screen than Moto G8, because it has a little bigger screen, a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot greater screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G8, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52s captures much better photos and videos than Moto G8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a much higher resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.