Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a bit better than the Moto G8, with a score of 76.9 against 74.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy A70 is older than Moto G8, it's body is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, more pixels per inch in the screen and a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G8, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A70 has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity. The Moto G8 takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size aperture.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is more expensive than Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G8. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy A70, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G8, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.