Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is way better than Moto G8's 74.4 general score. Although Galaxy Note 20 and Moto G8 were released only a couple of months apart, the Galaxy Note 20 construction is just a little thinner but a little bit heavier than Moto G8. The Galaxy Note 20 features just a little better processing power than Moto G8, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a brighter display than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a better screen density and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better camera than Moto G8, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Moto G8 features a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 has a little longer battery life than Motorola Moto G8, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G8. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G8, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.