Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Moto G8's 74.4 score. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Moto G8 has Android 10 version. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note 3 is older than Moto G8, it's construction is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has just a little better performance than Moto G8, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much better display than Moto G8, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G8 features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G8 also has a higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger camera aperture for better low-light images and video.
The Moto G8 features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G8 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G8 has superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a little more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.