Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than Moto G8's overall score of 74.4. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Note7 is noticeably older than Moto G8, it's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter. The Galaxy Note7 counts with a better screen than Moto G8, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixel density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Moto G8 features just a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto G8 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G8 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto G8 also has 4 more processing cores.
Moto G8 features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G8 also has a back camera with way more mega pixels. Moto G8 has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.