Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G84 has an overall score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note5's 80.2 general score. Galaxy Note5 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Moto G84, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Moto G84 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch in the screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
Moto G84 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G84 also has a much higher resolution camera, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
The Moto G84 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Moto G84 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.