Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than the Moto G84's general score of 80.9. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version while Moto G84 has Android 13 version. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto G84 features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a little inferior pixel quantity per screen inch, a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Moto G84 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G84 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Motorola Moto G84 both feature really similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The Motorola Moto G84 features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.