Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G9 Plus is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting a overall score of 80.5 against 79.9. Moto G9 Plus is an extremely older, heavier and thicker device than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Moto G9 Plus has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
Moto G9 Plus counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G9 Plus counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the Moto G9 Plus also has a much larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus and Galaxy A25 5G count with quite similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.