Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A41 is slightly better than the Moto G9 Plus, with a general score of 81.7 against 80.5. Even when the Samsung Galaxy A41 and the Moto G9 Plus were only released with a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A41 is notably lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A41 has a newer 11 version and Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features and performance improvements.
The Moto G9 Plus features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A41. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A41 features just a bit better looking display than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a bit greater screen pixel density.
Moto G9 Plus shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Moto G9 Plus also has a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Moto G9 Plus has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB, the Moto G9 Plus also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.