Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, having a 91.3 score against 80.5. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a somewhat lighter and thinner phone than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, even though both were released only a couple months apart. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10.
Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better processing power than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Moto G9 Plus. Both of them have the same (4K) video quality, a same size aperture, a same resolution camera in the back, a same size sensor and the same 30 fps video frame rates. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Moto G9 Plus features a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.