Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Moto G9 Plus, having a overall score of 98.9 against 80.5. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Moto G9 Plus has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features. Even when the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Moto G9 Plus were released with only 1 months difference, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is thinner and just a bit lighter.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because it has a greater pixel number per screen inch, a quite larger display and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Moto G9 Plus features a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher resolution back camera, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.