Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-07 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus is a little bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a overall score of 80.5 against 80.4. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus body is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and a lot heavier than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit sharper screen than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Moto G9 Plus has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G9 Plus. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56 percent greater battery capacity. Motorola Moto G9 Plus captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a much better 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.