Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-07 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G9 Plus is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note7, with an 80.5 score against 79.5. Moto G9 Plus is a much newer cellphone than the Galaxy Note7, but it is notably heavier and thicker. Moto G9 Plus counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G9 Plus also has 4 more CPU cores.
The Galaxy Note7 has a little more vivid display than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality and a camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G9 Plus has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.