Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2016-11-11 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is much better than the Moto M, getting a overall score of 82 against 71.6. Although the Apple iPhone XR is newer than Moto M, it's just a bit thicker and heavier. IPhone XR features a greater performance than Moto M, because although it has less CPU cores (but faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone XR has a bit sharper display than Moto M, because although it has a bit worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a little bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display. Moto M counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 128 GB.
Moto M counts with just a bit longer battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 4% greater battery capacity. The Apple iPhone XR shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a back camera with a lot lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.