Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-07-23 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black glare |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 is way better than the Moto M, with a general score of 86.3 against 71.6. The Asus ROG Phone 3 design is notably newer than the Moto M's, although it is way heavier and extremely thicker. The Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has 8 GB more RAM.
Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2340px resolution. Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a greater camera than Moto M, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has much more memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a really longer battery performance than Moto M, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.