Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-11-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is much better than Moto M's general score of 71.6. The Google Pixel 3 XL body has the same thickness than the Moto M, but it's heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better processing unit than Moto M. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit sharper display than Moto M, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960, a greater pixels density and a little bigger screen. The Moto M features a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much better camera than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low-light situations and a much better (4K) video definition. Google Pixel 3 XL features just a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto M, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.