Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Moto M, having a global score of 87.5 against 71.6. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot newer than the Motorola Moto M, it is just a little bit thicker and a little heavier. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto M, because it has a quite higher pixel density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite bigger display.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Moto M, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has better battery duration than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a very superior camera than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.