Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a general score of 78.6, which is just a bit better than the Moto M's 71.6 general score. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, LG V10 is an older, a bit thicker and heavier cellphone than the Moto M. Moto M has a better processing unit than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto M also has 7 more cpu cores.
The LG V10 has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto M, because it has a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, a quite bigger screen and a higher pixels count in each inch in the display. The LG V10 takes much better pictures and videos than Moto M, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the LG V10 also has a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations.
LG V10 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto M, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto M has a bit better battery life than LG V10, because it has 3050mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.