Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than the Motorola Moto M, getting a global score of 91.2 against 71.6. The LG Wing design is way newer, but heavier and a lot thicker than Motorola Moto M. The LG Wing features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2460px resolution.
LG Wing features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto M, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 224 GB more internal storage. The LG Wing features just a little better performance than Moto M, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG Wing has better battery life than Moto M, because it has a 31% larger battery capacity. The LG Wing features a very superior camera than Moto M, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.