Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is way better than Moto M, having an 86.3 score against 71.6. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is notably newer than the Moto M, it's just a bit thicker and heavier. The Moto M counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Moto M, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with much more storage for games and applications than Moto M, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better camera than Moto M, because it has a camera with way more megapixels, a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low light situations and a way higher video definition. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 48 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.