Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-11-11 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 has a global score of 82.9, which is better than Motorola Moto M's global score of 71.6. The Galaxy A34 is a thinner and noticeably lighter device than the Motorola Moto M. Samsung Galaxy A34 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto M. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Moto M counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a way better camera than Motorola Moto M, because it has a larger diafragm aperture and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera. Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a way better battery duration than Moto M, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.