Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is better than Motorola Moto M, getting an 83.8 score against 71.6. Although Galaxy A50 is just a bit heavier than Motorola Moto M, it's just a little bit thinner and also way newer. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto M, because it has a just a bit greater count of pixels per inch in the display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto M. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better camera than Moto M, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a much more MP back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture. Galaxy A50 counts with better battery lifetime than Moto M, because it has a 31 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.