Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Prism cube black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is a lot better than Moto M's 71.6 general score. Galaxy A51 5G's construction is a lot newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Moto M. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto M, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bigger screen and a quite higher pixels quantity per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto M, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a much better camera than Moto M, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a way higher (4K) video quality and a lot more megapixels camera. The Galaxy A51 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than Moto M, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.