Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than the Moto M, with a 92.9 score against 71.6. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a noticeably newer phone than Moto M, but it is a bit thicker and heavier. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit more vivid screen than Moto M, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better performance than Moto M, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Moto M, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 48 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.