Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than Moto M, with a 97.6 score against 71.6. Galaxy Fold is a way newer and thinner device than the Moto M, but it's a lot heavier. Galaxy Fold counts with a screen that is very similar to Motorola Moto M's screen, because although the Galaxy Fold has a quite worse pixels number per display inch, it also counts with a lot larger display and a higher 1536 x 2152 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto M, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto M, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Fold captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality. Galaxy Fold features a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.