Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.04 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is much better than Moto M's score of 71.6. Despite being the best we compare here, the Galaxy Note 3 is a notably older, just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier device than the Moto M. The Galaxy Note 3 has a little better performance than Moto M, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a sharper display than Moto M, because although it has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much better camera than Moto M, because although it has a back camera with a lower 13 megapixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto M, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 64 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Moto M, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.