Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is way better than the Motorola Moto M, getting a global score of 89 against 71.6. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a a bit heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto M, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Galaxy Note10 has a bit sharper display than Moto M, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto M, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto M, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Moto M, because although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture and a lot higher video quality. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little longer battery duration than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.