Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is way better than the Motorola Moto M, with an 86.2 score against 71.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto M's, although it is heavier and a bit thicker. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better processing power than Moto M, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a slightly better looking display than Moto M, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display. Galaxy Note10 Lite features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto M, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto M, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a lot worse 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and video and a way better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.