Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is a lot better than Motorola Moto M, having a score of 86.3 against 71.6. Galaxy S10e's construction has the same thickness than the Motorola Moto M, but it is just a little lighter. The Galaxy S10e has a little better hardware performance than Moto M, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto M, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels. Galaxy S10e counts with a greater camera than Moto M, because although it has a much lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a lot bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto M, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S10e features a bit superior battery duration than Moto M, because it has a 2 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.