Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Motorola Moto M, getting a 98 score against 71.6. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is way newer, but incredibly heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto M. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto M, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a bigger display and a higher pixels density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Moto M, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3050mAh. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better videos and photos than Moto M, because it has a much better video quality, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture to take better captures in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.