Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-11 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is better than the Moto M, getting an 82.6 score against 71.6. Galaxy S25's construction is notably thinner and way lighter than Moto M. The Moto M counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Moto M, because it has a quite greater screen pixels density, a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
Galaxy S25 has a much better camera than Moto M, because it has a way higher video quality, a larger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments and a much more megapixels back camera. The Galaxy S25 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Moto M, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features improved battery life than Moto M, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.