Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-11 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is way better than Motorola Moto M, with a overall score of 90.7 against 71.6. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is extremely thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto M. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better looking display than Moto M, because it has a larger screen, a quite better count of pixels in each inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Moto M counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto M, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Moto M, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures, a back camera with a way better resolution and a way better video quality. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto M, because it has a 64 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.