Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Moto M, getting an 85.6 score against 71.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is notably newer and somewhat thinner than Moto M's, although it's also heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto M, because it has a just a bit greater pixels density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better processing power than Moto M, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto M, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Moto M counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto M, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.