Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-11-11 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a lot better than the Motorola Moto M, having a global score of 86.1 against 71.6. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a just a bit thicker and notably heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto M. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit superior CPU than Moto M, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Moto M, because it has a lot higher 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little greater display density and a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments, a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much better 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Moto M, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.