Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
U.S. CellularXT1093
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than the Moto X (2014), with an 83.7 score against 73.4. LG V50 ThinQ's design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, although it's also incredibly heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, giving some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Moto X (2014) has a bit sharper display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller display, a bit lower number of pixels per inch of display and a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture to take better low-light images and a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.