Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 12 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2022-07-21 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gold | -- |
| -- | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 6a is just a bit better than the Moto X (2014), getting a 76.4 score against 73.4. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 6a has the newer 12 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, counting with lots of additional features and a performance increase. Google Pixel 6a's body is newer and somewhat thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Moto X (2014).
Motorola Moto X (2014) features a very superior processing unit than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional GPU. The Moto X (2014) counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, a quite smaller display and a bit less pixels per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 6a captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a camera with a worse 12.2 megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much larger aperture. Google Pixel 6a counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal storage.
Google Pixel 6a counts with a superior battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has a 92% greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel 6a is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto X (2014). So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 6a, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto X (2014), giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.