Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a bit better than Moto X (2014), with a 77 score against 73.4. HTC U Ultra's body is a lot newer and noticeably thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Moto X (2014). The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a bit sharper display than HTC U Ultra, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite smaller display.
The Moto X (2014) has a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 4 cores, the Moto X (2014) also counts with a GPU. The HTC U Ultra has a much greater memory for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
HTC U Ultra takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a camera with less mega-pixels and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images.
The HTC U Ultra features longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto X (2014). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the HTC U Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto X (2014), giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.