Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2017-05-18 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X (2014), having a 77.6 score against 73.4. HTC U11's construction is extremely newer and way thinner than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s, although it's somewhat heavier. HTC U11's processing unit is just as good as Motorola Moto X (2014)'s processing unit, because although the HTC U11 has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (but slower).
Moto X (2014) has a bit more vivid display than HTC U11, although it has a little smaller display, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a bit worse pixel number in each inch in the screen. The HTC U11 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos and a much bigger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations.
The HTC U11 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. HTC U11 has longer battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
HTC U11 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.