Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-09-04 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 global score. These devices use Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you some extra features and performance improvements. LG V30S ThinQ's body is newer and noticeably thinner than Moto X (2014)'s, although it's just a little bit heavier.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better CPU than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. Moto X (2014) features a bit more vivid display than LG V30S ThinQ, although it has a much lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a bit smaller display and a little bit lower screen pixel density.
LG V30S ThinQ features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a much bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations and a camera with more megapixels.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto X (2014). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto X (2014), and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.