Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 13 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than the Moto X (2014), getting a score of 83.4 against 73.4. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but notably heavier than Moto X (2014). Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, providing the user some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
Moto X (2014) counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto X (2014) counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and 10 GB less RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a lot bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures, a lot higher video quality, a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.