Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Gold | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is better than Moto X (2014), with a score of 86.2 against 73.4. Although Motorola Moto G200 5G is heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's somewhat thinner and also notably newer. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has a newer 11 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, providing the user some nice extra features and increased performance.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and 6 GB more RAM memory. Moto X (2014) features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
Moto G200 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also has a way higher resolution back camera and a larger diafragm aperture. The Moto G200 5G counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a superior battery life than Moto X (2014), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.