Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-09-23 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Gold | Polar night |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8.3 5G is just a bit better than Moto X (2014), getting an 80.5 score against 73.4. Although Nokia 8.3 5G is notably heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's somewhat thinner and also newer. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Nokia 8.3 5G has the newer 11 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version.
The Nokia 8.3 5G has a little better processing power than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores (although they are slower) and 6 GB more RAM. The Moto X (2014) has a more vivid display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixels amount in each inch of display.
The Nokia 8.3 5G features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Nokia 8.3 5G has a bit better camera than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a back camera with a way better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 96% larger battery size.
The Nokia 8.3 5G costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto X (2014), but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.